Thursday, January 31, 2013
Police State Scares Students With Simulated Terror Drill, Including Gunfire
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 30, 2013
At Cary-Grove High School in Illinois, a scheduled Code Red lockdown was performed. This drill was complete with the firing of blanks into a hallway to give the students the very real impression that they were being attacked. Officials claimed that this exercise would help teachers and students “recognize the sound and react quickly should an active gunman situation occur.”
According the school website: “The drill will begin with a public address announcement about the lockdown. After staff have secured their rooms, Cary police and administrators will sweep the building to ensure all students made it into secure locations and assess any potential issues that may become apparent from the practice. Following this, a second PA announcement will be made informing students and staff that gunfire will be simulated so that they might be able to recognize the sound and react quickly, should an active gunman situation occur.”
They went on to explain: “Following the drill, a discussion will ensue between the students and their classroom teacher. We will utilize this feedback as a building and police department to assess our security and make any necessary adjustments to our building plan. Our sole purpose for utilizing the blanks is to fully prepare our students and staff. “
Parents whose children attend the school were concerned that the simulated gunfire was going beyond necessities. One parent said: “If you need to run a drill, you run a drill. They run fire drills all the time, but they don’t run up and down the hallway with a flamethrower.”-[Full Article]
Labels:
police state,
school,
terror drills,
trauma
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Military Training Drills Resume in Preparation for Martial Law
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 29, 2013
Competitive Outcomes , an organization training young military recruits from the JROTC, ROTC, cadet programs, foreign militaries and police and fire departments are conducting customized drill training exercises, seminars and providing manuals in 2013 in Marietta, Georgia; Los Angeles and San Diego, California. They work with the US Navy, armed and unarmed divisions of ROTC and JROTC; as well as the Air Force.
Recently black hawk helicopters flew across the skies in Miami, Florida in a joint drill exercise between the US Military and local police. Traffic was blocked off on major streets. Military personnel claimed that the exercises were in preparation for overseas combat missions. However the sound of gunfire could be heard as locals were alarmed.
The Miami-Dade County Police Department said in a statement that this was “routine” and “designed to ensure the military’s ability to operate in urban environments, prepare forces for upcoming overseas deployments and meet mandatory certification requirement.”-[Full Article]
Labels:
exercises,
martial law,
military drills
Military drills in major cities alarm citizens, raise fears of government action
Examiner.com
Military drills taking place in and over two major metropolitan areas are causing many Americans to wonder if indeed, the government is preparing for civil unrest or martial law. Over the last week, The Blaze reported Monday, military helicopters were seen buzzing the city of Miami in a joint exercise. Houston ABC affiliate KTRK said Monday that the Army is conducting a multi-agency drill in the area of Scott and Airport.
Authorities in Miami, however, said there's nothing to be concerned about.
“This is routine training conducted by military personnel designed to ensure the military’s ability to operate in urban environments, prepare forces for upcoming overseas deployments, and meet mandatory training certification requirement,” local police told the Miami Herald.
Nevertheless, the sight of soldiers rappelling onto rooftops and the sound of gunfire have many concerned.-[Full Article]
Military drills taking place in and over two major metropolitan areas are causing many Americans to wonder if indeed, the government is preparing for civil unrest or martial law. Over the last week, The Blaze reported Monday, military helicopters were seen buzzing the city of Miami in a joint exercise. Houston ABC affiliate KTRK said Monday that the Army is conducting a multi-agency drill in the area of Scott and Airport.
Authorities in Miami, however, said there's nothing to be concerned about.
“This is routine training conducted by military personnel designed to ensure the military’s ability to operate in urban environments, prepare forces for upcoming overseas deployments, and meet mandatory training certification requirement,” local police told the Miami Herald.
Nevertheless, the sight of soldiers rappelling onto rooftops and the sound of gunfire have many concerned.-[Full Article]
Labels:
martial law
Friday, January 25, 2013
Shock claim: Obama removing all military leaders from command if they will not fire on U.S. citizens
(NaturalNews) It is not a claim being made by some obscure personality
who hosts a late-night "radio show" on shortwave, or by a known far-out
lunatic seeking his latest 15 minutes of fame, but by none other than a
Nobel Peace Prize nominee.
Reports surfaced Jan. 22 that Dr. Jim Garrow, nominated for the prize in 2009, made a shocking claim on his Facebook page in recent days that he was informed by a top military vet that the Obama administration's "litmus test" for new military leaders is whether or not they will follow orders to fire on American citizens if need be.
Reports surfaced Jan. 22 that Dr. Jim Garrow, nominated for the prize in 2009, made a shocking claim on his Facebook page in recent days that he was informed by a top military vet that the Obama administration's "litmus test" for new military leaders is whether or not they will follow orders to fire on American citizens if need be.
Labels:
military
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
The lie of Roe v. Wade
World Net Daily
Can good law ever be built on a foundation of lies and deceit?
Can good law ever be built on a foundation of lies and deceit?
Proponents of abortion apparently think so.
Thirty years later, they continue to defend Roe v. Wade as perhaps the most important Supreme Court ruling in the history of America. Roe v. Wade has resulted in the slaying of 40 million unborn babies since Roe. Yet, the abortion-at-all-costs crowd speaks of Roe in reverential tones – almost religious tones. They speak of it as a profound human-rights breakthrough. They speak of it as if it is one of the Ten Commandments. No new member of the Supreme Court must be seated if he or she does not subscribe to every tenet of Roe, they say.
But now Roe is being challenged in a new way, by a most unlikely force – by “Roe” herself.
Norma McCorvey was “Jane Roe” in 1973. She was the subject of the case that went to the Supreme Court. And now she is filing suit to overturn the decision.
She is being represented by the Justice Foundation, which contends changes in the law and new research show Roe v. Wade is unjust.
Norma McCorvey is in an unusual position to get this case heard because, as a party to the litigation, she has the right to petition for its reopening.
McCorvey was 21 when she became pregnant out of wedlock. She made up a story about being raped. She worked with two lawyers who wanted to challenge Texas abortion laws.
“Plain and simple, I was used,” she says. “I was a nobody to them. They only needed a pregnant woman to use for their case, and that is it. They cared, not about me, but only about legalizing abortion. Even after the case, I was never respected – probably because I was not an Ivy League-educated, liberal feminist like they were.”
Thirty years later, they continue to defend Roe v. Wade as perhaps the most important Supreme Court ruling in the history of America. Roe v. Wade has resulted in the slaying of 40 million unborn babies since Roe. Yet, the abortion-at-all-costs crowd speaks of Roe in reverential tones – almost religious tones. They speak of it as a profound human-rights breakthrough. They speak of it as if it is one of the Ten Commandments. No new member of the Supreme Court must be seated if he or she does not subscribe to every tenet of Roe, they say.
But now Roe is being challenged in a new way, by a most unlikely force – by “Roe” herself.
Norma McCorvey was “Jane Roe” in 1973. She was the subject of the case that went to the Supreme Court. And now she is filing suit to overturn the decision.
She is being represented by the Justice Foundation, which contends changes in the law and new research show Roe v. Wade is unjust.
Norma McCorvey is in an unusual position to get this case heard because, as a party to the litigation, she has the right to petition for its reopening.
McCorvey was 21 when she became pregnant out of wedlock. She made up a story about being raped. She worked with two lawyers who wanted to challenge Texas abortion laws.
“Plain and simple, I was used,” she says. “I was a nobody to them. They only needed a pregnant woman to use for their case, and that is it. They cared, not about me, but only about legalizing abortion. Even after the case, I was never respected – probably because I was not an Ivy League-educated, liberal feminist like they were.”
Labels:
abortion,
Norma McCorvey,
Roe v. Wade
Woman Behind Roe v. Wade: “I’m Dedicating My Life to Overturning It”
LifeNews.com
Woman Behind Roe v. Wade: “I’m Dedicating My Life to Overturning It”
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 1/22/13 1:12 PM
As Roe v. Wade and its allowance for unlimited abortions throughout pregnancy turns 40 today, the woman behind the infamous Supreme Court case has pledged her life to overturning it.
Norma McCorvey never wanted an abortion — she was seeking a divorce from her husband — but young, pro-abortion feminist attorney Sarah Weddington used McCorvey’s case as a means of attempting to overturn Texas’ law making most abortions illegal. Weddington took the case all the way to the Supreme Court, which invalidated every pro-life state law in the nation protecting unborn children and the rest is history.
But most Americans don’t know that McCorvey, who was “pro-choice” on abortion at the time, is now a pro-life advocate. She is now dedicated to reversing the Supreme Court case that bears her fictitious name, Jane Roe.
In a video, McCorvey explains her effort to obtain a legal abortion in the 1970s when facing an unplanned pregnancy. However, she has never had an abortion and now realizes that her court case was the biggest mistake of her life and currently fights to stop abortion.
“Back in 1973, I was a very confused twenty-one year old with one child and facing an unplanned pregnancy,” she says in the ad. “At the time I fought to obtain a legal abortion, but truth be told, I have three daughters and never had an abortion.”
“I think it’s safe to say that the entire abortion industry is based on a lie…. I am dedicated to spending the rest of my life undoing the law that bears my name,” McCorvey says.
She concludes the 60 second ad with the words: “You read about me in history books, but now I am dedicated to spreading the truth about preserving the dignity of all human life from natural conception to natural death.”
Woman Behind Roe v. Wade: “I’m Dedicating My Life to Overturning It”
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 1/22/13 1:12 PM
As Roe v. Wade and its allowance for unlimited abortions throughout pregnancy turns 40 today, the woman behind the infamous Supreme Court case has pledged her life to overturning it.
Norma McCorvey never wanted an abortion — she was seeking a divorce from her husband — but young, pro-abortion feminist attorney Sarah Weddington used McCorvey’s case as a means of attempting to overturn Texas’ law making most abortions illegal. Weddington took the case all the way to the Supreme Court, which invalidated every pro-life state law in the nation protecting unborn children and the rest is history.
But most Americans don’t know that McCorvey, who was “pro-choice” on abortion at the time, is now a pro-life advocate. She is now dedicated to reversing the Supreme Court case that bears her fictitious name, Jane Roe.
In a video, McCorvey explains her effort to obtain a legal abortion in the 1970s when facing an unplanned pregnancy. However, she has never had an abortion and now realizes that her court case was the biggest mistake of her life and currently fights to stop abortion.
“Back in 1973, I was a very confused twenty-one year old with one child and facing an unplanned pregnancy,” she says in the ad. “At the time I fought to obtain a legal abortion, but truth be told, I have three daughters and never had an abortion.”
“I think it’s safe to say that the entire abortion industry is based on a lie…. I am dedicated to spending the rest of my life undoing the law that bears my name,” McCorvey says.
She concludes the 60 second ad with the words: “You read about me in history books, but now I am dedicated to spreading the truth about preserving the dignity of all human life from natural conception to natural death.”
Labels:
abortion,
Norma McCorvey,
Roe v. Wade
Friday, January 18, 2013
Joyce Riley Interviews Mike Powers 1-16-13 TPH Sandy Hook Special Investigation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Published on Jan 16, 2013
Former US Naval Law Enforcement
Veteran and US Army Infantry/Reconnaissance Military Veteran MIKE POWERS
has found glaring inconsistencies regarding the Sandy Hook shooting and
will be breaking it down for us. We must understand that this is the
elephant in the living room and must be shared with everyone that you
know. This is a CAN'T MISS SHOW and of the utmost importance that we
understand what is really going on.
Labels:
Sandy Hook,
video
Blacklash to Obama Gun Control Exec Orders Reverberates Across the Nation
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 18, 2013
Eric Reed, pro-gun Texan, has organized “Guns Across America” (GCA), a rally to take place at each state capital, in nearly every state on January 19th. Reed has coordinated this demonstration because he “was trying to figure out why people weren’t being more proactive about this, Reed said. “Then I realized I’m part of the problem. It takes somebody to stand up and say, ‘Hey, we’re not going to accept this. We’re against it.’
Reed believes that Obama is “restricting and punishing all law-abiding American citizens. He’s taking people who have never committed a crime in their lives and he’s trying to tell them that these guns are ‘assault weapons.’ Well, I’ve got guns in my home. If they’re ‘assault weapons,’ then mine must be defective because they haven’t assaulted anybody.”-[Full Article]
Labels:
2nd amendment
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Communist in Chief Obama Announces Exec Orders & Legislation on Gun Reform
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 17, 2013
Suddenly, just as gun reform legislation is about to be announced and executive orders are waiting to be signed, children from across America have written letters to President Obama, asking for gun reform. One perfectly timed letter said: “It’s a free country but I recommend there needs (to) be a limit with guns. Please don’t let people own machine guns or other powerful guns like that.” Another pleaded: “I am writing to ask you to STOP gun violence. I am very sad about the children who lost their lives. So, I thought I would write to you to STOP gun violence.”
With maturity of an adult (who probably wrote the letters in the first place), these children add to the emotional throws that the Obama administration have used since the Sandy Hook shooting to justify the destruction of the 2nd Amendment.
Obama has at his disposal $500 million in executive orders and legislative proposals that demand Congress ban all “military-style” assault rifles, high-capacity magazines, restrict private sales and gun shows, as well as install a national background check system that identifies all registered gun owners.
There are 23 executive orders that Obama will sign to make sure his brand of gun-control is mandated in the US. Without waiting for Congressional approval, Obama will imbue the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to write propaganda studies in support of his gun ban.-[Full Article]
Labels:
2nd amendment
50 Shocking Questions That You Should Ask To Anyone That Is Not A Prepper Yet
The Economic Collapse Blog
Share this list of shocking questions with everyone you know that needs to wake up. Sometimes asking good questions is the best way to get someone that you care about to understand something. When I attended law school, I became very familiar with something called "the Socratic method". It is a method that has been traditionally used in law schools all over the United States. Law professors will bombard their students with questions, and the goal is to stimulate critical thinking and allow students to discover the answers for themselves. Many times those of us that can see what is happening to this country get frustrated when we try to get others to see what is so apparent to us. But instead of preaching to them, perhaps asking questions would be more helpful. When you ask someone a question, they are almost forced to think about what you just said and come up with a response. And without a doubt, the fact that America is in decline is undeniable. Those that would choose to blindly have faith in the system are foolish, because it is glaringly obvious that the system is failing. Our economy is heading for collapse and the world around us is becoming more unstable with each passing day. So it shouldn't be a surprise that the number of preppers in the United States is absolutely exploding. Some estimates put the number of preppers in the U.S. as high as 3 million, and the movement continues to explode. (Read More....)
Share this list of shocking questions with everyone you know that needs to wake up. Sometimes asking good questions is the best way to get someone that you care about to understand something. When I attended law school, I became very familiar with something called "the Socratic method". It is a method that has been traditionally used in law schools all over the United States. Law professors will bombard their students with questions, and the goal is to stimulate critical thinking and allow students to discover the answers for themselves. Many times those of us that can see what is happening to this country get frustrated when we try to get others to see what is so apparent to us. But instead of preaching to them, perhaps asking questions would be more helpful. When you ask someone a question, they are almost forced to think about what you just said and come up with a response. And without a doubt, the fact that America is in decline is undeniable. Those that would choose to blindly have faith in the system are foolish, because it is glaringly obvious that the system is failing. Our economy is heading for collapse and the world around us is becoming more unstable with each passing day. So it shouldn't be a surprise that the number of preppers in the United States is absolutely exploding. Some estimates put the number of preppers in the U.S. as high as 3 million, and the movement continues to explode. (Read More....)
America Is Being Systematically Transformed Into A Totalitarian Society
End Of The American Dream
If someone were to ask you for an example of a “totalitarian society”, how would you respond? Most Americans would probably think of horribly repressive regimes such as the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Communist China, East Germany or North Korea, but the truth is that there is one society that has far more rules and regulations than any of those societies ever dreamed of having. In the United States today, our lives are governed by literally millions of laws, rules and regulations that govern even the smallest details of our lives, and more laws, rules and regulations are constantly being added. On January 1st, thousands of restrictive new laws went into effect all over America, but most Americans have become so accustomed to the matrix of control that has been constructed all around them that it does not even bother them when even more rules and regulations are put into place. In fact, a growing number of Americans have become totally convinced that “freedom” and “liberty” must be tightly restricted for the good of society and that “the free market” is inherently dangerous. On the national, state and local levels, Americans continue to elect elitist control freaks that are very eager to tell all the rest of us how to run virtually every aspect of our lives. According to Merriam-Webster, the following is one of the ways that the word “totalitarian” is defined: “of or relating to a political regime based on subordination of the individual to the state and strict control of all aspects of the life and productive capacity of the nation especially by coercive measures”. And that is exactly what we are witnessing in America today – nearly all aspects of our lives and of the economy are very tightly controlled by a bunch of control freaks that just keep tightening that control with each passing year. We still like to call ourselves “the land of the free”, but the truth is that we are being transformed into a totalitarian society unlike anything the world has ever seen before. Where will we end up eventually if we keep going down this road? (Read More.....)
If someone were to ask you for an example of a “totalitarian society”, how would you respond? Most Americans would probably think of horribly repressive regimes such as the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Communist China, East Germany or North Korea, but the truth is that there is one society that has far more rules and regulations than any of those societies ever dreamed of having. In the United States today, our lives are governed by literally millions of laws, rules and regulations that govern even the smallest details of our lives, and more laws, rules and regulations are constantly being added. On January 1st, thousands of restrictive new laws went into effect all over America, but most Americans have become so accustomed to the matrix of control that has been constructed all around them that it does not even bother them when even more rules and regulations are put into place. In fact, a growing number of Americans have become totally convinced that “freedom” and “liberty” must be tightly restricted for the good of society and that “the free market” is inherently dangerous. On the national, state and local levels, Americans continue to elect elitist control freaks that are very eager to tell all the rest of us how to run virtually every aspect of our lives. According to Merriam-Webster, the following is one of the ways that the word “totalitarian” is defined: “of or relating to a political regime based on subordination of the individual to the state and strict control of all aspects of the life and productive capacity of the nation especially by coercive measures”. And that is exactly what we are witnessing in America today – nearly all aspects of our lives and of the economy are very tightly controlled by a bunch of control freaks that just keep tightening that control with each passing year. We still like to call ourselves “the land of the free”, but the truth is that we are being transformed into a totalitarian society unlike anything the world has ever seen before. Where will we end up eventually if we keep going down this road? (Read More.....)
Obama Announces List of Executive Orders to Further US Disarmament
http://lewrockwell.com/rep4/obama-gun-orders.html
The following
is a list, provided by the White House, of executive actions President
Obama plans to take to address gun violence.
|
- Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.
- Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system.
- Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system.
- Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.
- Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun.
- Publish a letter from ATF to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers.
- Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign.
- Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission).
- Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.
- Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make it widely available to law enforcement.
- Nominate an ATF director.
- Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations.
- Maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime.
- Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence.
- Direct the Attorney General to issue a report on the availability and most effective use of new gun safety technologies and challenge the private sector to develop innovative technologies.
- Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes.
- Release a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law enforcement authorities.
- Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers.
- Develop model emergency response plans for schools, houses of worship and institutions of higher education.
- Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover.
- Finalize regulations clarifying essential health benefits and parity requirements within ACA exchanges.
- Commit to finalizing mental health parity regulations.
- Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health.
Labels:
2nd amendment
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
ALL WARS ARE BANKERS' WARS!
WhatReallyHappened.com
NEW! PODCAST OF 'ALL WARS ARE BANKERS WARS' FROM JANUARY 14TH, 2013 RADIO SHOW.
I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to force private central banks onto nations, so let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations. There is ample precedent for this.
The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest. After the revolution, the new United States adopted a radically different economic system in which the government issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the people through interest-bearing bank notes.
NEW! PODCAST OF 'ALL WARS ARE BANKERS WARS' FROM JANUARY 14TH, 2013 RADIO SHOW.
I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to force private central banks onto nations, so let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations. There is ample precedent for this.
The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest. After the revolution, the new United States adopted a radically different economic system in which the government issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the people through interest-bearing bank notes.
"The refusal of King George 3rd to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, was probably the prime cause of the revolution." -- Benjamin Franklin, Founding FatherBut bankers are nothing if not dedicated to their schemes to acquire your wealth, and know full well how easy it is to corrupt a nation's leaders. Just one year after Mayer Amschel Rothschild had uttered his infamous "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws", the bankers succeeded in setting up a new Private Central Bank called the First Bank of the United States, largely through the efforts of the Rothschild's chief US supporter, Alexander Hamilton. Founded in 1791, by the end of its twenty year charter the First Bank of the United States had almost ruined the nation's economy, while enriching the bankers. Congress refused to renew the charter and signaled their intention to go back to a state issued value based currency on which the people paid no interest at all to any banker. This resulted in a threat from Nathan Mayer Rothschild against the US Government, "Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war." Congress still refused to renew the charter for the First Bank of the United States, whereupon Nathan Mayer Rothschild railed, "Teach those impudent Americans a lesson! Bring them back to colonial status!" Financed by the Rothschild controlled Bank of England, Britain then launched the war of 1812 to recolonize the United States and force them back into the slavery of the Bank of England, or to plunge the United States into so much debt they would be forced to accept a new private central bank. And the plan worked. Even though the War of 1812 was won by the United States, Congress was forced to grant a new charter for yet another private bank issuing the public currency as loans at interest, the Second Bank of the United States. Once again, private bankers were in control of the nation's money supply and cared not who made the laws or how many British and American soldiers had to die for it.-[Full Article]
Labels:
bankers,
central banks,
Michael Rivero
Catherine Austin Fitts: "Gun control is about making it easier to take away the financial assets of the honest hard-working people."
Politicians Already Committed to Inflation-Catherine Austin Fitts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRaSPO6bSY8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRaSPO6bSY8
Labels:
2nd amendment,
Catherine Austin Fitts
FBI figures show more Americans are killed with hammers, clubs, hands and feet than rifles
(NaturalNews) A new set of data from the FBI shows what tens of millions
of Americans already know but that Washington and other elitist
politicians refuse to acknowledge: That for the past several years more
people have been killed with clubs and hammers than with rifles.
According to the data:
-- In 2005, there were 445 people killed with rifles, compared to 608 who were killed with a "blunt object" (club, hammer, etc.);
-- In 2006, the numbers were 438 and 618 respectively; in 2007, 453 and 647; in 2008, 380 versus 603; and in 2009, there were 348 deaths by rifle compared to 611 who were killed with a blunt object.
According to the data:
-- In 2005, there were 445 people killed with rifles, compared to 608 who were killed with a "blunt object" (club, hammer, etc.);
-- In 2006, the numbers were 438 and 618 respectively; in 2007, 453 and 647; in 2008, 380 versus 603; and in 2009, there were 348 deaths by rifle compared to 611 who were killed with a blunt object.
Labels:
FBI,
statistics
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Firearms & Ammunition Sales Soar as Biden Finishes Talks on Gun Control
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 12, 2013
While a State Senator, Barack Obama voted against legislation that contained an exception for handguns if it were used in defense of one’s home.
In 1996, Obama said he would support state legislation to ““ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns” on a survey.
After meeting with Vice President Joe Biden at the White House for continued talks on gun-control, the National Rifle Association released a statement saying that “we attended today’s White House meeting to discuss how to keep our children safe and were prepared to have a meaningful conversation about school safety, mental health issues, the marketing of violence to our kids and the collapse of federal prosecutions of violent criminals.”
The NRA voiced disappointment “with how little this meeting had to do with keeping our children safe and how much it had to do with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment.” The agendas of the Interagency Task Force on Gun Control (TFGC) spent more time proposing restrictions on registered gun owners than trying to figure out how to prevent another Sandy Hook shooting tragedy.
In fact, the recent incident was the justification for blaming “law-abiding gun owners . . . for the acts of criminals and madmen.” It became apparent to the NRA that the Obama administration was concerned about rendering the 2nd Amendment ineffectual instead of adding meaningful contributions to the gun-control debate.-[Full Article]
Occupy Corporatism
January 12, 2013
While a State Senator, Barack Obama voted against legislation that contained an exception for handguns if it were used in defense of one’s home.
In 1996, Obama said he would support state legislation to ““ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns” on a survey.
After meeting with Vice President Joe Biden at the White House for continued talks on gun-control, the National Rifle Association released a statement saying that “we attended today’s White House meeting to discuss how to keep our children safe and were prepared to have a meaningful conversation about school safety, mental health issues, the marketing of violence to our kids and the collapse of federal prosecutions of violent criminals.”
The NRA voiced disappointment “with how little this meeting had to do with keeping our children safe and how much it had to do with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment.” The agendas of the Interagency Task Force on Gun Control (TFGC) spent more time proposing restrictions on registered gun owners than trying to figure out how to prevent another Sandy Hook shooting tragedy.
In fact, the recent incident was the justification for blaming “law-abiding gun owners . . . for the acts of criminals and madmen.” It became apparent to the NRA that the Obama administration was concerned about rendering the 2nd Amendment ineffectual instead of adding meaningful contributions to the gun-control debate.-[Full Article]
Labels:
2nd amendment
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Orly Taitz, AIPAC Zionist Agendas & Obama’s Real Birth Certificate
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 11, 2013
The original plan to get to war with Iran involved a scheme devised by President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that involved coercing Congress to back a military strike against Islamic nations for the Zionist regime.
However, in September of last year, Obama refused to speak to Netanyahu about future plans of war in the Middle East in what was called a “snub” by the mainstream media. The move put a damper on the plans previously agreed upon and also resulted in a turning away by Obama from Netanyahu toward other goals – such as focusing on re-election as US president to continue his implementation of Communist ideology while replacing the rights imbued to American citizens by the US Constitution.
Now a question that has been weighing on the minds of Americans had come to the forefront of discussion; whether or not Obama has a legitimate right to be US President based on his natural-born status. Is Obama a Kenyan? Or is he the son of Frank Marshall Davis?-[Full Article]
Occupy Corporatism
January 11, 2013
The original plan to get to war with Iran involved a scheme devised by President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that involved coercing Congress to back a military strike against Islamic nations for the Zionist regime.
However, in September of last year, Obama refused to speak to Netanyahu about future plans of war in the Middle East in what was called a “snub” by the mainstream media. The move put a damper on the plans previously agreed upon and also resulted in a turning away by Obama from Netanyahu toward other goals – such as focusing on re-election as US president to continue his implementation of Communist ideology while replacing the rights imbued to American citizens by the US Constitution.
Now a question that has been weighing on the minds of Americans had come to the forefront of discussion; whether or not Obama has a legitimate right to be US President based on his natural-born status. Is Obama a Kenyan? Or is he the son of Frank Marshall Davis?-[Full Article]
Labels:
birth certificate,
Obama
Biden Confirms “There Are Executive Orders” to Mandate Gun Restriction
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 10, 2013
Vice President Joe Biden, head of the Interagency Gun Control Task Force, (GCTF) spoke to the press after a meeting with various interest groups discussing strategies on gun-control legislation. Biden said that President Obama is seriously considering using executive orders to have mandates on firearms, effectively circumventing the Congress and ensuring that the 2nd Amendment is curtailed.-[Full Article]
Occupy Corporatism
January 10, 2013
Vice President Joe Biden, head of the Interagency Gun Control Task Force, (GCTF) spoke to the press after a meeting with various interest groups discussing strategies on gun-control legislation. Biden said that President Obama is seriously considering using executive orders to have mandates on firearms, effectively circumventing the Congress and ensuring that the 2nd Amendment is curtailed.-[Full Article]
Friday, January 11, 2013
Armed men escape mall during police standoff
WESTCHESTER, LOS ANGELES (KABC) --
Fourteen people were released after being held hostage inside a
Nordstrom Rack store in Westchester all night during an armed robbery.
The search is still on for at least two suspects.
"They observed a second suspect walking out of the store in the company of a female. That suspect looked in the direction of the officers, grabbed the female and forced her back inside the Nordstrom," said LAPD Lt. Andy Neiman.
SWAT officers surrounded the shopping center and closed off the area. After a couple of hours, they forced their way into the Nordstrom Rack at about 2 a.m. and found a group of hostages, 13 women and 1 man, huddled together and frightened. Police say they were all employees.
"The majority of them were in one location, a storage room in one part of the store," said Neiman.
Police confirmed that one female hostage was sexually assaulted. She was transported to a local hospital. One other person who was stabbed was treated and released at the scene. There were reports that a third person was pistol-whipped, but authorities could not confirm that information.
The robbery suspects are still at large. The hostages told police the suspects carried weapons. It is unclear what was stolen from the store, and police do not know how the suspects escaped.-[Full Article]
[Webmaster - This is what happens in a GUN-FREE ZONE.]
Labels:
California,
Los Angeles,
Nordstrom,
robbery
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Guns and Freedom
LewRockwell.com
The right of the people to keep and bear arms is an extension of the natural right to self-defense and a hallmark of personal sovereignty. It is specifically insulated from governmental interference by the Constitution and has historically been the linchpin of resistance to tyranny. And yet, the progressives in both political parties stand ready to use the coercive power of the government to interfere with the exercise of that right by law-abiding persons because of the gross abuse of that right by some crazies in our midst.
When Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, he was marrying the nation at its birth to the ancient principles of the natural law that have animated the Judeo-Christian tradition in the West. Those principles have operated as a break on all governments that recognize them by enunciating the concept of natural rights.
As we have been created in the image and likeness of God the Father, we are perfectly free just as He is. Thus, the natural law teaches that our freedoms are pre-political and come from our humanity and not from the government, and as our humanity is ultimately divine in origin, the government, even by majority vote, cannot morally take natural rights away from us. A natural right is an area of individual human behavior – like thought, speech, worship, travel, self-defense, privacy, ownership and use of property, consensual personal intimacy – immune from government interference and for the exercise of which we don’t need the government’s permission.-[Full Article]
by
Andrew P. Napolitano
The right of the people to keep and bear arms is an extension of the natural right to self-defense and a hallmark of personal sovereignty. It is specifically insulated from governmental interference by the Constitution and has historically been the linchpin of resistance to tyranny. And yet, the progressives in both political parties stand ready to use the coercive power of the government to interfere with the exercise of that right by law-abiding persons because of the gross abuse of that right by some crazies in our midst.
When Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, he was marrying the nation at its birth to the ancient principles of the natural law that have animated the Judeo-Christian tradition in the West. Those principles have operated as a break on all governments that recognize them by enunciating the concept of natural rights.
As we have been created in the image and likeness of God the Father, we are perfectly free just as He is. Thus, the natural law teaches that our freedoms are pre-political and come from our humanity and not from the government, and as our humanity is ultimately divine in origin, the government, even by majority vote, cannot morally take natural rights away from us. A natural right is an area of individual human behavior – like thought, speech, worship, travel, self-defense, privacy, ownership and use of property, consensual personal intimacy – immune from government interference and for the exercise of which we don’t need the government’s permission.-[Full Article]
Labels:
2nd amendment,
Andrew Napolitano
Disney Will Gather Private Information on Theme Park Visitors with New “Magic” Bracelets
AllGov.com
Visitors to Disney World in Orlando, Florida, will be revealing virtually everything they do at the park to company officials, if they participate in its new magic bracelet program.
This spring, Disney plans to offer MyMagic+, a special rubber bracelet encoded with customers’ credit card information. By using the bracelets, visitors will be able to enter the park and purchase food or souvenirs without pulling out their wallets.
But this also means that visitors’ actions, behavior and whereabouts will be carefully tracked within the park. Disney will collect this information, from what rides people go on and all purchases they make, to which costumed characters they choose to interact with. It will all be stored in a Disney data base, conceivably for marketing purposes.-[Full Article]
Photo Credit: Kent Phillips, Disney
Visitors to Disney World in Orlando, Florida, will be revealing virtually everything they do at the park to company officials, if they participate in its new magic bracelet program.
This spring, Disney plans to offer MyMagic+, a special rubber bracelet encoded with customers’ credit card information. By using the bracelets, visitors will be able to enter the park and purchase food or souvenirs without pulling out their wallets.
But this also means that visitors’ actions, behavior and whereabouts will be carefully tracked within the park. Disney will collect this information, from what rides people go on and all purchases they make, to which costumed characters they choose to interact with. It will all be stored in a Disney data base, conceivably for marketing purposes.-[Full Article]
Labels:
big brother,
Disney,
Disney World,
privacy,
surveillance,
tracking
Monday, January 7, 2013
US Gov, Foreign Troops & Local Police Prepare For Marital Law in 2013
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 7, 2013
Those with nothing to lose the 47% of Americans on social or subsidy programs are expected to be the ones to take to the streets and riot at the beginning of the 2nd American civil war.
Manufactured poverty has become the standard under the Communist-in-Chief, Barack Obama. This breaks the will of the populace as they are unable to feed their families as the economy suffers while the growth of the government continues. Social norms now dictate that a government handout is nothing to be ashamed of. And the road to serfdom is being paved.
Those able and willing to fight against the “change” that has “come to America” thanks to Obama would be the target of most of the violence. In many documents published by the US government and globalist think-tanks, explanation of effective urban combat has been discussed and plotted. One such document is entitled “Combined Arms Operations in Urban Terrain” , dating back to 2002.
Here the “characteristics” of urban centers are explained and how to successfully lock down a major US city is posed to combine the most effective course of action. From aerial attacks, to small-unit battles on the ground, the scenario of combat through intelligence, through knowledge of the terrain, and preparation is analyzed and presented so that commanders and leaders can consider all options before beginning such an endeavor.-[Full Article]
Occupy Corporatism
January 7, 2013
Those with nothing to lose the 47% of Americans on social or subsidy programs are expected to be the ones to take to the streets and riot at the beginning of the 2nd American civil war.
Manufactured poverty has become the standard under the Communist-in-Chief, Barack Obama. This breaks the will of the populace as they are unable to feed their families as the economy suffers while the growth of the government continues. Social norms now dictate that a government handout is nothing to be ashamed of. And the road to serfdom is being paved.
Those able and willing to fight against the “change” that has “come to America” thanks to Obama would be the target of most of the violence. In many documents published by the US government and globalist think-tanks, explanation of effective urban combat has been discussed and plotted. One such document is entitled “Combined Arms Operations in Urban Terrain” , dating back to 2002.
Here the “characteristics” of urban centers are explained and how to successfully lock down a major US city is posed to combine the most effective course of action. From aerial attacks, to small-unit battles on the ground, the scenario of combat through intelligence, through knowledge of the terrain, and preparation is analyzed and presented so that commanders and leaders can consider all options before beginning such an endeavor.-[Full Article]
Labels:
martialk law
Obama May Use Exec Order to Mandate Gun-Control in America
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 7, 2013
Over the weekend, a mother was able to protect two twin girls because of her 2nd Amendment rights. During a home invasion, the mother hid her children in a crawlspace inside the home, while an unknown man forced his way into the home. The suspect was shot by the mother after discovering her and the children in their hiding place.
Because of her bravery and responsible gun ownership, this mother saved herself and her children from what could have been a deadly situation.
However, if the guns are removed from the law-abiding American citizens, incidents like this will be a common occurrence:-[Full Article]
Occupy Corporatism
January 7, 2013
Over the weekend, a mother was able to protect two twin girls because of her 2nd Amendment rights. During a home invasion, the mother hid her children in a crawlspace inside the home, while an unknown man forced his way into the home. The suspect was shot by the mother after discovering her and the children in their hiding place.
Because of her bravery and responsible gun ownership, this mother saved herself and her children from what could have been a deadly situation.
However, if the guns are removed from the law-abiding American citizens, incidents like this will be a common occurrence:-[Full Article]
Labels:
2nd amendment
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Cops: Mother of two surprises intruder with five gunshots
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
The Loganville mother of two assumed the knocks on her front door Friday afternoon were from a solicitor.
“Don’t answer,” she yelled to her 9-year-old twins playing downstairs.
When the visitor began repeatedly ringing the doorbell, she called her husband at work.
“Get the kids and hide,” he told his wife.
As he dialed 911, his 37-year-old spouse, who works from home, collected the children and hid with them in a crawlspace adjoining her office. By that time, the intruder had forced his way into the three-story residence on Henderson Ridge Drive with a crowbar, authorities said. He allegedly rummaged through the home, eventually working his way up to the attic office.
“He opens the closet door and finds himself staring down the barrel of a .38 revolver,” said Walton County Sheriff Joe Chapman, who relayed the woman’s narrative to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. He asked that her name be withheld.
The woman fired six bullets, five of which hit Paul Ali Slater in the face and neck area, Chapman said. But Slater was still conscious.
“The guy’s face down, crying,” the sheriff said. The woman told him to stay down or she’d shoot again.
Slater, unaware that she had emptied her chamber, obliged as the mother and her children ran to a neighbor’s house.
The injured burglar eventually made it out of the home and into his car, driving away before deputies arrived on the scene. He didn’t get far.
“When you got five bullets in you, it makes you kind of disoriented,” Chapman told the AJC.
Deputies found Slater bleeding profusely in a neighbor’s driveway.
“I’m dying. Help me,” he told them, according to Chapman.
Slater was transported to Gwinnett Medical Center and is expected to survive, the sheriff said.
The Long Island native, who now lives in Gwinnett County, was released from the Gwinnett jail in late August after serving six months for simple battery and three counts of probation violation. Slater has six other arrests in Gwinnett dating back to 2008, according to jail records.
“My wife’s a hero,” the woman’s husband, Donnie Herman, told Channel 2 Action News in a brief statement. He did not respond to a request for comment from the AJC. “She protected her kids. She did what she was supposed to do.”
Chapman remarked that one of his deputies, impressed with the woman’s resolve, told the sheriff she had handled her first shooting better than he had.
“That mother’s instinct kicked in,” Chapman said. “You go after a mother’s kids and she’ll find herself capable of doing things she never thought she was capable of.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related links:
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/woman-hiding-kids-shoots-intruder/nTm7s/
http://myfox8.com/2013/01/06/ga-mom-shoots-intruder-5-times-saves-children/
“Don’t answer,” she yelled to her 9-year-old twins playing downstairs.
When the visitor began repeatedly ringing the doorbell, she called her husband at work.
“Get the kids and hide,” he told his wife.
As he dialed 911, his 37-year-old spouse, who works from home, collected the children and hid with them in a crawlspace adjoining her office. By that time, the intruder had forced his way into the three-story residence on Henderson Ridge Drive with a crowbar, authorities said. He allegedly rummaged through the home, eventually working his way up to the attic office.
“He opens the closet door and finds himself staring down the barrel of a .38 revolver,” said Walton County Sheriff Joe Chapman, who relayed the woman’s narrative to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. He asked that her name be withheld.
The woman fired six bullets, five of which hit Paul Ali Slater in the face and neck area, Chapman said. But Slater was still conscious.
“The guy’s face down, crying,” the sheriff said. The woman told him to stay down or she’d shoot again.
Slater, unaware that she had emptied her chamber, obliged as the mother and her children ran to a neighbor’s house.
The injured burglar eventually made it out of the home and into his car, driving away before deputies arrived on the scene. He didn’t get far.
“When you got five bullets in you, it makes you kind of disoriented,” Chapman told the AJC.
Deputies found Slater bleeding profusely in a neighbor’s driveway.
“I’m dying. Help me,” he told them, according to Chapman.
Slater was transported to Gwinnett Medical Center and is expected to survive, the sheriff said.
The Long Island native, who now lives in Gwinnett County, was released from the Gwinnett jail in late August after serving six months for simple battery and three counts of probation violation. Slater has six other arrests in Gwinnett dating back to 2008, according to jail records.
“My wife’s a hero,” the woman’s husband, Donnie Herman, told Channel 2 Action News in a brief statement. He did not respond to a request for comment from the AJC. “She protected her kids. She did what she was supposed to do.”
Chapman remarked that one of his deputies, impressed with the woman’s resolve, told the sheriff she had handled her first shooting better than he had.
“That mother’s instinct kicked in,” Chapman said. “You go after a mother’s kids and she’ll find herself capable of doing things she never thought she was capable of.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related links:
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/woman-hiding-kids-shoots-intruder/nTm7s/
http://myfox8.com/2013/01/06/ga-mom-shoots-intruder-5-times-saves-children/
[Webmaster - If Feinstein and Obama have their way, they
will make families like this mother and her children into victims. What
would have happened to this mother and her two children if Feinstein
and Obama would have had their way and taken away their
means to protect themselves? Would they have been raped? Murdered?
Assaulted? Quite possibly. Feinstein, Obama, Bloomberg and all the
other gun grabbers don't give a damn about our safety and whether or not
we have the means to protect ourselves. All they want is a disarmed
and dependent servile population to be able to rule over in tyranny. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD YOU REGISTER YOUR FIREARMS.
REGISTRATION IS THE FIRST STEP TOWARDS CONFISCATION.]
Labels:
2nd amendment,
Georgia,
gun control
Saturday, January 5, 2013
WEBSITE: SandyHookHoax.com
It seems unbelievable, because it is.
THE OFFICIAL STORY OF THE SANDY HOOK SHOOTING IS RIDDLED WITH HOLES
http://www.sandyhookhoax.com/
THE OFFICIAL STORY OF THE SANDY HOOK SHOOTING IS RIDDLED WITH HOLES
http://www.sandyhookhoax.com/
Feinstein Gun Control Bill Requires Fingerprint Registration & Confiscation
Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
January 4, 2013
The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) Crime Statistics annually reported states that the reality of gun-related violence is not as the mainstream and US government purports it to be.
The FBI report says that there were only 445 deaths attributed to rifles in 2005. In 2006 that number was 438. While the statistical data fluctuates, in 2011 there were 323 murders associated with rifles.
It appears that clubs, hammers and fists are more deadly than rifles, according to the FBI.
Aside from inflated perceptions about guns, the FBI reports that more Americans have registered for National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) back-ground checks related to gun purchases; with as estimated 2.78 million and a 39% rise over tallies taken in November 2012.
Mainstream propaganda adds to the national debate on gun-control by supposing that Liberals fight for a repeal of the 2nd Amendment and categorize the National Rifle Association (NRA) as a terrorist organization by making membership illegal.-[Full Article]
Labels:
2nd amendment
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
I Am a Peaceful AR-15 Assault Rifle Owner
Lew Rockwell
"Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurances and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that's good." ~ George Washington
I can’t think of any reason I need to own my AR-15 assault rifle. I don’t pretend to need it for self defense. I also own several handguns. Any one of my handguns would be adequate to allow me an opportunity to defend myself, or another person, from virtually any act of aggression by another individual. Indeed, I could have easily halted any of the recent gun based rampages, by any of those deranged lunatics, with just one of my handguns. I wish I had been there.
I have needlessly and peacefully owned my AR-15 for many years. I keep my AR-15 securely locked in a gun safe in the very same home where my young children live. My children are aware of my AR-15. Like many other things in life, I have taught my children about guns.
Recently, some of my kids attended a private gun safety class given by a highly experienced gun expert. I enjoyed watching my kids learn about my AR-15. I admit being a bit nostalgic about my AR-15. I spent lots of time learning about every aspect of the AR-15 when I was in Marine Corps boot camp at Parris Island, South Carolina. I also carried an AR-15 when I served my country in Operation Desert Storm in Saudi Arabia. I had it with me when I lived in a dirt hole on the border of Kuwait. It is the weapon I know better than any other.
I own lots of dangerous things I don’t need. I don’t need my highly modified 600+ hp Z06 Corvette, or my Harley Davidson motorcycle, or that crazy looking knife I sometimes jokingly say was imported directly from the Klingon Empire. All of these things can be used, intentionally or accidentally, to hurt others. Because I have always been careful, peaceful and responsible, none of the things I own have ever been used to hurt another person.
I am an American. As such, none of my rights depend on a showing of need. I am a free man who has the right to define and pursue my happiness in any peaceful way I see fit. The government does not grant me rights. I was born free. The legitimate role of government is to act as my agent to protect my rights; which exist independent of government. Americans do not beg the government for rights nor are they required to demonstrate a "need" for rights.-[Full Article]
"Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurances and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that's good." ~ George Washington
I can’t think of any reason I need to own my AR-15 assault rifle. I don’t pretend to need it for self defense. I also own several handguns. Any one of my handguns would be adequate to allow me an opportunity to defend myself, or another person, from virtually any act of aggression by another individual. Indeed, I could have easily halted any of the recent gun based rampages, by any of those deranged lunatics, with just one of my handguns. I wish I had been there.
I have needlessly and peacefully owned my AR-15 for many years. I keep my AR-15 securely locked in a gun safe in the very same home where my young children live. My children are aware of my AR-15. Like many other things in life, I have taught my children about guns.
Recently, some of my kids attended a private gun safety class given by a highly experienced gun expert. I enjoyed watching my kids learn about my AR-15. I admit being a bit nostalgic about my AR-15. I spent lots of time learning about every aspect of the AR-15 when I was in Marine Corps boot camp at Parris Island, South Carolina. I also carried an AR-15 when I served my country in Operation Desert Storm in Saudi Arabia. I had it with me when I lived in a dirt hole on the border of Kuwait. It is the weapon I know better than any other.
I own lots of dangerous things I don’t need. I don’t need my highly modified 600+ hp Z06 Corvette, or my Harley Davidson motorcycle, or that crazy looking knife I sometimes jokingly say was imported directly from the Klingon Empire. All of these things can be used, intentionally or accidentally, to hurt others. Because I have always been careful, peaceful and responsible, none of the things I own have ever been used to hurt another person.
I am an American. As such, none of my rights depend on a showing of need. I am a free man who has the right to define and pursue my happiness in any peaceful way I see fit. The government does not grant me rights. I was born free. The legitimate role of government is to act as my agent to protect my rights; which exist independent of government. Americans do not beg the government for rights nor are they required to demonstrate a "need" for rights.-[Full Article]
Labels:
2nd amendment
The Fallacy of Gun Control
American Thinker
As a parent of two boys under the age of four, a responsible gun owner, and an NRA member, I'd like to take this opportunity to rebut "Sensible Arms Control," in which my good friend Brett Joshpe argues for more gun control following the Newtown tragedy.
Gun Rights are Inalienable and Natural
There is nothing "lazy" about characterizing the inalienable right to defend self, family, and property, and the right to hunt, as "natural rights." Preaching from their ivory towers (typically capitol buildings, college campuses, gated communities, and urban apartments), gun control proponents casually dismiss the dire consequences of disarming law-abiding citizens. I own a home in an empty corner of Maine, where my family and I are generally out of range of rapid police assistance both on our property and while traveling in the area. As a concealed carry permit holder, I have the opportunity to save our lives if we are confronted by violent criminals.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/the_fallacy_of_gun_control.html#ixzz2GjkuGRXA
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
As a parent of two boys under the age of four, a responsible gun owner, and an NRA member, I'd like to take this opportunity to rebut "Sensible Arms Control," in which my good friend Brett Joshpe argues for more gun control following the Newtown tragedy.
Gun Rights are Inalienable and Natural
There is nothing "lazy" about characterizing the inalienable right to defend self, family, and property, and the right to hunt, as "natural rights." Preaching from their ivory towers (typically capitol buildings, college campuses, gated communities, and urban apartments), gun control proponents casually dismiss the dire consequences of disarming law-abiding citizens. I own a home in an empty corner of Maine, where my family and I are generally out of range of rapid police assistance both on our property and while traveling in the area. As a concealed carry permit holder, I have the opportunity to save our lives if we are confronted by violent criminals.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/the_fallacy_of_gun_control.html#ixzz2GjkuGRXA
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Labels:
2nd amendment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)