At some point in the
future - it may be sooner than later - an evil regime is going to be
betrayed. And when one is betrayed, others will surely follow.
Which will be the first? Israel?
Surely not! The USA’s foreign policy, its media and its political structures are completely corrupted by, and infected with, Zionism.
Yet, only two months ago, the New York Post quoted the famous realpolitik US diplomat Henry Kissinger as asserting that, “In ten years, there will be no more Israel.” Moreover, the mind-set of the USA State Department could be shifting. A study (Preparing for a Post-Israel Middle East) commissioned by all sixteen American intelligence agencies supports Kissinger’s assertion although it is not so specific on the timing.
Of course the study, all eighty two pages of it, is being condemned by Zionists as a hoax but the problem with that is the study’s argument and facts. If they are valid then they are valid. It’s as simple as that. Thus the study says that Israel cannot withstand powerful forces which include an international rejection of USA Zionist policy; a strong movement in favour of Palestine; the Arab Democratic Spring; and the Islamic Awakening.
So, if those things are valid, why should the USA continue to be associated with a self-pitying, paranoid, rancid, rabid, racist entity called Israel indulging in the progressive genocide of the Palestinians?
Indeed, the USA is having to face up to the reality that it, and Israel, are becoming pariah states. Clear evidence of this comes from the recent UN votes on sanctions against Cuba; on nuclear disarmament in Middle East; and on status for Palestine - all of which reveal incipient pariah status. Indeed, on the Palestine vote the chagrin on the face of USA representative Susan Rice told it all - she realised that a turning point had happened and there is no going back.
There is then the increasing awareness that the USA and Israel (wanting to further the interests of an expanding Zionist state by having a general war against Islam) were complicit in the murder of three thousand Americans on 9/11. About eighty seriously unresolved issues about 911 exist but the incontrovertible evidence of murder is that a skyscraper, Tower Number Seven, which was NOT hit by an aeroplane, crumbled into dust. First, it crumbled - just like that! And, second, it crumbled into dust.
Moreover, thirty minutes beforehand, a BBC journalist, Jane Stanley (taking her information from a piece of paper given to her) reported Tower Number Seven had collapsed - when it had not! BUT, thirty minutes later, it DID collapse - and into dust!
How did she “know” in advance? (Answer - she had been given that piece of paper).
-[Full Article]
