At some point in the
future - it may be sooner than later - an evil regime is going to be
betrayed. And when one is betrayed, others will surely follow.
Which will be the first? Israel?
Surely not! The USA’s foreign policy, its media and its political
structures are completely corrupted by, and infected with, Zionism.
Yet, only two months ago, the New York Post quoted the famous
realpolitik US diplomat Henry Kissinger as asserting that, “In ten
years, there will be no more Israel.” Moreover, the mind-set of the USA
State Department could be shifting. A study (Preparing for a
Post-Israel Middle East) commissioned by all sixteen American
intelligence agencies supports Kissinger’s assertion although it is not
so specific on the timing.
Of course the study, all eighty two pages of it, is
being condemned by Zionists as a hoax but the problem with that is the
study’s argument and facts. If they are valid then they are valid. It’s
as simple as that. Thus the study says that Israel cannot withstand
powerful forces which include an international rejection of USA Zionist
policy; a strong movement in favour of Palestine; the Arab Democratic
Spring; and the Islamic Awakening.
So, if those things are valid, why should the USA continue to be
associated with a self-pitying, paranoid, rancid, rabid, racist entity
called Israel indulging in the progressive genocide of the Palestinians?
Indeed, the USA is having to face up to the reality that it, and
Israel, are becoming pariah states. Clear evidence of this comes from
the recent UN votes on sanctions against Cuba; on nuclear disarmament in
Middle East; and on status for Palestine - all of which reveal
incipient pariah status. Indeed, on the Palestine vote the chagrin on
the face of USA representative Susan Rice told it all - she realised
that a turning point had happened and there is no going back.
There is then the increasing awareness that the USA and Israel
(wanting to further the interests of an expanding Zionist state by
having a general war against Islam) were complicit in the murder of
three thousand Americans on 9/11. About eighty seriously unresolved
issues about 911 exist but the incontrovertible evidence of murder is
that a skyscraper, Tower Number Seven, which was NOT hit by an
aeroplane, crumbled into dust. First, it crumbled - just like that!
And, second, it crumbled into dust.
Moreover, thirty minutes beforehand, a BBC journalist, Jane Stanley
(taking her information from a piece of paper given to her) reported
Tower Number Seven had collapsed - when it had not! BUT, thirty minutes
later, it DID collapse - and into dust!
How did she “know” in advance? (Answer - she had been given that piece of paper). -[Full Article]
http://benswann.com/
Ben Swann Reality Check takes a look at claims by Architects and
Engineers for 9/11 Truth about why they say the official story on the
collapse of Building 7 is not only untrue, it is not possible. Also, a
new poll shows that more and more Americans are now rethinking the
official story.
Taken
from the second part of his excellent two part interview with Robert
Sungenis regarding Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Based on
Sungenis' comprehensive two part review of the book "Solving 911" by
Christopher Bollyn found at http://www.bollyn.com. Links to full interviews here:
Almost every
politically-aware person on the planet is puzzled by Israeli Prime
Minister Netanyahu's bizarre obsession with Iran. Netanyahu is risking
his political career, his reputation, and Israel's future by intervening
in the US presidential elections.
He is using all of Zionism's considerable might - including
organized crime assets like “Las Vegas Godfather” Sheldon Adelson - to
force Obama to attack Iran; or, failing that, to make sure that Obama is
defeated by the Zionist puppet Romney. There are even rumors of
Israeli-sponsored assassination attempts on Obama.
Even the rabidly pro-Zionist Jewish Daily Forward has editorialized:
“It’s difficult to recall a time when an Israeli prime minister has
inserted himself into a presidential election campaign in the way that
Benjamin Netanyahu has. It’s even harder to recall a time when a trusted
ally openly urged the American president to undertake a questionable,
unpopular and highly risky war. We sure hope Netanyahu knows what he’s
doing, because the stakes for him - and for the two nations he professes
to care about the most - could not be higher.”
The Jewish Daily Forward has good reasons to wonder whether
Netanyahu knows what he's doing. The editorialist cites polls showing
that the American people strongly oppose attacking Iran, even if war
breaks out between Iran and Israel and only US intervention could save
Israel! These polls show that American voters no longer give a damn
whether Israel, which has chosen to live by the sword, finally dies by
the sword. As Dave Lindorff observes, Netanyahu's mad obsession with
pushing the US into yet another unwanted war for Israel “may have
fundamentally undermined the long-standing 'special relationship'
between the US and Israel.”
And still Netanyahu continues on this seemingly suicidal course. He
even orders the Mossad and its CIA assets including Gladio veteran Terry
Jones to unleash a rabidly anti-Islam film, spammed into the faces of
every Muslim on the planet via millions of dollars of computer server
time and intelligence agency expertise - an obvious attempt to fan the
flames of Islamophobia and pave the way to a US war on Iran for Israel.
Obama, who is on record saying he hates Netanyahu and that Netanyahu is a
liar, and who knows that Netanyahu manufactured the “Innocence of
Muslims” crisis to try to get Romney elected, responded by refusing to
meet with Netanyahu in New York, and going on the David Letterman Show
instead. A more blatant snub could hardly be imagined.
So, what in the world is Netanyahu really up to? Does he actually
believe that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, even though the CIA has
certified that it does not?
Of course, he doesn't really believe such nonsense. Even hard-line
Israeli strategists admit that Iran appears to be only developing
nuclear expertise, not actual weapons. Furthermore, Iran has not
attacked another nation in centuries.
Since the “nuclear crisis” is a hoax (like alleged Iraqi WMD in
2003), then what is the real reason for Netanyahu's Iran obsession? Is
it the Iranian government's support for anti-Zionist resistance groups
like Hamas and Hezbollah, and its calls for an end to Zionism through
free and fair elections?
Perhaps. Iran's open commitment to principled anti-Zionism
represents the nearly unanimous position of the people of the Middle
East, who have never accepted the genocidal Zionist entity as a
legitimate state. Israel has been able to bully every other government
in the region into shameful silence. The Islamic Republic of Iran will
not be silenced. Threats to level Iran with bombs seeks to send a
message to future Middle Eastern governments: Do not give a voice to
your people's resistance to Zionism, or else!
But while starting a war might seek to punish Iran for its
anti-Zionism, such a war would carry terrible risks for Israel. In the
impossible event that all goes well for Israel on the battlefield, the
suffering of the people of Iran would probably shame the world into
turning against Zionism even more sharply than the world turned against
apartheid in the 1980s.
But there is no guarantee that things would go well for
Israel on the battlefield. Iran has the capability to riddle Israel with
rocket attacks, or even to take out Israel's Dimona nuclear facility
and perhaps render Israel and much of the surrounding region permanently
uninhabitable. And Israel does not have the capability to seriously
damage Iran's nuclear energy program without US help. If the US
intervened on the side of Israel, Iran could shut the Straits of Hormuz,
and possibly sink many, if not all, of the ships there with Sunburn
missiles, driving gasoline prices over USD 10 a gallon and paralyzing
the world economy. Additionally, Iran has the capability to massively
attack the US bases that surround it, killing thousands, if not tens of
thousands, of US soldiers. A US president, especially one who dislikes
Netanyahu and puts America's interests ahead of Israel's, would be very
unlikely to help Netanyahu attack Iran.
Given that a war on Iran is an all-loss proposition for Israel, why
is Netanyahu fanatically fanning the flames of war, to the extent that
even his American Zionist cheering section is baffled and embarrassed by
his behavior?
Some question Netanyahu's intelligence, arguing that he is just a
furniture salesman who has been promoted far beyond his level of
competence. While there may be some truth to this - I certainly wouldn't
want to overestimate Netanyahu's intelligence - I don't think he's
quite that stupid. I think Netanyahu has a very good reason to prefer
war with Iran, despite all its risks, to peace. I think he does know
what he's doing.
Netanyahu needs the 9/11-triggered 100-years-war on
Islam to continue for the very good reason that if it does not, the
State of Emergency still in place in the US will be lifted, and
Americans, unencumbered by the National Security restrictions of
wartime, will quickly learn what really happened on September 11th,
2001. That possibility poses a very real existential threat to Israel -
and to Netanyahu.
As Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Strategic Studies at the US
Army War College, told Press TV: “I have had long conversations over the
past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the
Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both
cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation.
Period. If Americans ever know that Israel did this, they are going to
scrub them off the earth.” And even if Israel were “scrubbed off the
earth” peacefully through a one-state solution, Netanyahu would
certainly hang for his role in the 9/11 attacks.
Unfortunately for Netanyahu and Zionism, Dr. Sabrosky isn't the only
US National Security insider leaking the truth about 9/11. A very large
number of military and intelligence people have come forward.The
two biggest recent leaks are revelations by CIA asset Susan Lindauer
that the CIA had detailed foreknowledge of 9/11 and attributed the
controlled demolitions of the three NYC skyscrapers to “those goddamned
Israelis”; and the assertion by Gwenyth Todd, who worked beside Richard
Clarke on the National Security Council, that Clarke (who was publicly
fired from an earlier job for being an Israeli spy) is the top suspect
as hands-on controller of 9/11 from the US end. Yes, you heard that
right: Richard Clarke's colleague on the National Security Council,
Gwenyth Todd, suspects Clarke of masterminding and running the 9/11
attacks. If Todd and other high-level sources are right about this,
Clarke's book title Your Government Failed You is an understatement.
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as
the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also
claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey,
and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about
9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election
could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the
nearest lamp-post.
No wonder Netanyahu is “overplaying his hand” by doing everything he
can to get rid of Obama. And no wonder Netanyahu is desperately trying
to throw gasoline on the “clash of civilizations” fire and trigger war
with Iran. A huge Middle East war, no matter how destructive, would
maintain the wartime State of Emergency in the US and impeded the
inexorable revelation of America's biggest state secret: That American
traitors, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush,
Richard Myers, and others, helped Israel blow up the World Trade Center,
bomb the Pentagon, and kill 3000 Americans on 9/11.
A sub 5 minute educational video about
the events surrounding 9/11. How 19 men armed with box cutters and
directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the
world, launched the most sophisticated attack in history, against the
most heavily defended nation on the planet.
14 Facts Which Show Criminal Negligence and Ass-Covering
On this eleventh anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks, we would like to take a look back at what went wrong.
While the Bush administration tried to make its response to 9/11 its
crowning achievement, the truth is that they acted with criminal
incompetence and ass-covering.
(2) The chair of the 9/11 Commission said that the attack was preventable. It is thoroughly-documented that an attack such as 9/11 was entirely foreseeable.
Specifically, Al Qaeda flying planes into the World Trade Center and
Pentagon was something which American military and intelligence services
– and our allies – knew could happen.
(3) U.S. intelligence services have repeatedly infiltrated Al Qaeda
and related groups, but then idiotically failed to stop them. For
example – as the New York Times, CBS News
and others reported – the FBI informant involved in the 1993 bombing of
the World Trade Center begged the FBI to substitute fake bomb power for
real explosives, but his FBI handler moronically let real explosives be
used.
Similarly – as reported by Newsweek, the New York Times
and others – an FBI informant hosted and rented a room to 2 of the 9/11
hijackers while they were in the U.S., but then stupidly failed to stop
them.
Indeed, former counter-terrorism boss Richard Clarke theorizes
that top CIA brass tried to recruit the hijackers and turn them to our
side, but were unsuccessful. And – when they realized had failed – they
covered up their tracks so that the FBI would not investigate their
illegal CIA activities , “malfeasance and misfeasance”, on U.S. soil.
In other words, our intelligence services’ attempts to infiltrate and
work with people inside of terrorist cells was horribly botched; and
they did a horrible job of stopping terrorist attacks once they were set
in motion.
(4) Dick Cheney was in charge of all of America’s counter-terrorism exercises, activities and responses on 9/11. See this Department of State announcement and this CNN article. As such, at least part of the blame for failing to stop the attacks is on his shoulders.
According to the New Yorker – a secret document
written by the National Security Council (NSC) on February 3, 2001
directed NSC staff to cooperate fully with the Energy Task Force as it
considered the “melding” of two seemingly unrelated areas of policy:
“The review of operational policies towards rogue
states,” such as Iraq, and “actions regarding the capture of new and
existing oil and gas fields”.
It is difficult to brush off Cheney’s Energy Task Force’s examination
of arab oil maps as a harmless comparison of American energy policy
with known oil reserves because the NSC explicitly linked the Task
Force, oil, and regime change.
The above-linked New Yorker article quotes a former senior director
for Russian, Ukrainian, and Eurasian affairs at the NSC said:
If this little group was discussing geostrategic plans
for oil, it puts the issue of war in the context of the captains of the
oil industry sitting down with Cheney and laying grand, global plans.
See also this essay.
Is that why idiot Cheney – the guy in charge of all terror protection
efforts before and on 9/11 – failed to effectively respond to 9/11 with
normal air defense? Was he too busy pining over Iraqi oil maps to pay
any attention?
(6) The military – under the idiot Vice President’s command that day
– didn’t scramble enough fighter jets, and then scrambled jets far over
the Atlantic Ocean, in what Senator Mark Dayton called:
The most gross incompetence and dereliction of
responsibility and negligence that I’ve ever, under those extreme
circumstances, witnessed in the public sector.
Cheney – and the other people in charge of anti-terror response that day – screwed up big time.
But just like the bank CEOs who are rewarded for causing the
financial crisis by being given bailouts and subsidies and breaks, the
military and intelligence officials who dropped the ball that day have
been promoted. As Time reported:
They have basically promoted the exact same people who
have presided over the … failure,” says a former Justice Department
official, “and those individuals took the same thinking with them.
As the Washington Post reported, no one from the CIA, FBI or NSA has been reprimanded, punished, or fired for the events of 9/11.
The same is true for the military personnel on watch that day. For
example, General Myers, who was Acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff on September 11th, was quickly confirmed as Chairman two weeks later. General Ralph Eberhart, Commander in Chief of NORAD at the time of the attack, was promoted to head the new “Northern Command” a year after the attack.
Just as with the financial crisis, no one has been punished, and the people who screwed up have been allowed to fail upwards.
(8) Many of the draconian “national security programs” – such as the
Patriot Act, spying on Americans and indefinite detention – overtly
approved after 9/11 had actually been implemented or planned before 9/11. September 11th was used as an excuse to ramp up these programs.
These programs were approved during the Bush administration … but
were never terminated by the Obama administration. In fact, while Obama
is a nicer and smarter guy than Bush, top constitutional law professors
say that Obama has actually expandedthese programs. And top national security experts say that these programs actually harm our national security and increase the threat from terrorism. See this and this.
(9) The Bush administration immediately used the 9/11 attacks as an excuse to carry out decades-old neoconservative plans to implement regime change throughout the Middle East and North Africa. And see this,
We can’t get the bad guys using peaceful means, now can we? We have a war to fight!
(12) In contrast, other governments that might actually have sponsored the attacks have been let off scot-free … and have even been given huge amounts of financial support.
(13) As the 9/11 Commission itself notes, as part of its ass-covering efforts, the Bush administration engaged in criminal obstruction of justice.
There are numerous examples of obstruction of justice into the 9/11 investigation, including:
The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Official Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 said that Soviet-style government “minders” obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses
The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements
As reported by ACLU, FireDogLake, RawStory
and many others, declassified documents shows that Senior Bush
administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against
probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001
Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured
At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11
Commission Report have claimed that they told interrogators information
as a way to stop being “tortured.”
One of the Commission’s main sources of information was tortured
until he agreed to sign a confession that he was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO
READ
The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to themselves
The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at certain cover ups and obstructions of justice:
The Commission’s co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”
The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – said
“At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an
agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said
“I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was
described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had
been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is
not true.”
And the Co-Chair of the official Congressional Inquiry Into 9/11 – and former head of the Senate Intelligence Committee – has called for a new 9/11 investigation.
Whatever the details of the screw-ups on 9/11, the Bush
administration used the attacks as a justification to promote their
agenda. And – instead of changing the agenda – Obama has continued it.
It wasn't Muslims who were claimed to have been killed on the alleged "Flight
77" and who worked for government or defense, particularly the Navy; it was
John Yamnicky who, strangely, for the first time
did not tell his
daughter that he was going on travel, and who, like
William Caswell, had worked for the Navy on top-secret "black" projects.
Others included
Charles Burlingame, a former Navy fighter pilot who used to work in the
section of the Pentagon that was hit and who had formulated a response for the
eventuality of an airliner being flown into the Pentagon and whose daughter
Wendy subsequently died in a "suspicious
fire" at a 50-story high-rise in New Jersey in December 2006,
Wilson "Bud" Flagg, a retired American Airlines pilot and Navy Admiral,
Stanley Hall, an expert in anti-radar technology and a director of program management at Raytheon,
Bryan Jack, a senior executive and top budget analyst who worked at the
Pentagon,
Chandler Keller, a Boeing propulsion engineer,
Dong
Lee, a Boeing engineer who worked for their Integrated Defense Systems and
who had worked for the National Security Agency (NSA) for 14 years,
Barbara Olson, CNN commentator and wife of the US Solicitor General who
claimed to have received cell phone calls from "Flight 77",
Ruben Ornedo, a Boeing propulsion / satellite communications engineer,
Robert Penniger, an electrical engineer with BAE Systems, and another dozen
alleged "Flight 77 passengers" who were linked to defense and government who, we
are told, all just
happened to be on this
unusually low
occupancy flight. These people, well loved and
respected as honest, decent heroes, are the very sort of characters whose
work could have been horrifically exploited without their knowledge, and whom
the 9/11 perpetrators would need to eliminate to prevent them speaking out after
the attacks.
It wasn't a Muslim who, in response to the question "Do the orders still
stand?" regarding the response - or more precisely, the
lack of response - to an aircraft
that was rapidly homing in on the Pentagon and ten miles out after both of the Twin Towers had already
been hit by planes more than half an hour
previously, whipped his neck around and replied "Of course the orders
still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"; it was
Dick Cheney.
It
wasn't Muslims who
in
2000 co-authored a document which called for a "new Pearl Harbor";
it was Roger Barnett, Alvin Bernstein, Stephen Cambone, Eliot Cohen, Devon
Gaffney Cross, Thomas Donnelly, David Epstein, David Fautua, Dan Goure, Donald
Kagan, Fred Kagan, Robert Kagan, Robert Killebrew, William Kristol, Mark Lagon,
James Lasswell, I. Lewis Libby, Robert Martinage, Phil Meilinger, Mackubin
Owens, Steve Rosen, Gary Schmitt, Abram Shulsky, Michael Vickers, Barry Watts,
Paul Wolfowitz, and Rabbi Dov Zakheim.
It wasn't Muslims who had a motive for employing a "Flight
Termination System" to take control of EgyptAir
Flight 990 - a Boeing 767 -
on October 31, 1999 (after a bizarre coincidence in which "air
crash victims grief counselor" Ed McLaughlin of the Family Enterprise
Institute was the
only person to board the ill-fated plane in Los Angeles and get off at New
York), send it plunging into the Atlantic 60 miles south of Nantucket killing
all 217 on board, none of whom were Israelis but
33 of the casualties were
Egyptian army officers including two Air Force brigadier generals and two
army major generals, and promote the concept of "Muslim
suicide pilots" to a gullible public; it was Jews who would have needed to
conduct a trial run of electronically hijacking in-flight
Boeing
aircraft for their imminent false-flag terror operation that was to be blamed on
"Muslim suicide pilots / hijackers", with the EgyptAir Flight 990 "inquiry"
being
overseen by Zionist Jew Bernard Loeb who had
Jewish translators transcribe the cockpit recordings, and the FBI conducting
a
character assassination to smear the alleged "suicidal" co-pilot.
It wasn't Muslims who
paid Ali al-Jarrah more than $300,000 for services rendered, i.e., posing as
a "supporter" of the Palestinian cause while betraying his country to an enemy
state, and who was a cousin of Ziad al-Jarrah who was alleged to be one of
nineteen 9/11 "suicide hijackers"; it was Israel that paid this
Mossad asset.
It wasn't Muslims who
fabricated a fairy
story about Pfc.
Jessica Lynch being ambushed, stabbed, shot, bravely continuing to shoot
Iraqis, being abused,
raped,
and held captive in a hospital by Iraqi guards, and later rescued by elite US
forces; it was "unnamed US
officials" who
lied, since in fact there was no "rescue", Lynch's
gun had jammed with sand,
she
was being cared for by the Iraqis after being injured in a car crash, she
had no "bullet holes" or "knife wounds", the hospital was not "under guard", and
doctors had even tried to return Lynch to US forces themselves.
It wasn't Muslims who ganged up on a handicapped Jew for hiking on his own
land, beat him with clubs, dragged him along the ground, tied him to a power
pole and continued to beat and kick him as Muslim soldiers did nothing to stop
it and police merely advised the thugs to pour water on the victim's head to
wash away the blood before journalists and photographers arrived; it was a gang
of
four cowardly, bigoted Jewish settlers who beat up a handicapped Palestinian
with impunity, basking in the knowledge that Jewish soldiers and police would
not act impartially, and even
returning a week
later to torment the neighbors, ransacking their home and destroying their
few possessions.
It wasn't Muslim soldiers who beat up and killed a Jew with clubs and rifle
butts and kicks to the head and then, after an 'investigation', concluded that
the soldiers had "acted properly"; it was
the Israeli "Defense"
Forces who smashed three holes in a Palestinian teenager's skull killing him
as he merely waited at a bus stop, continuing to beat him as he lay unconscious,
then made up a story about him "pulling a knife" and suggested that he was
"mentally unstable" in a case that is sadly
all too typical of violence perpetrated by racist, bigoted right-wing
extremist
Jewish supremacists upon those whom they perceive as "animals
in human form".
It wasn't Muslims who created a global organization named the "Anti
Defamation League" in order to defend Muslim criminals by playing the race card
and accusing their pursuers of being "racists" and "anti-Semites"
who were guilty of "hate crimes"; it
was Jews who set up the Anti Defamation League of B'nai B'rith in response to
the lynching of
Leo Frank, president of the Atlanta chapter of the B'nai B'rith Jewish
secret society who had been convicted of murdering 13-year-old Mary Phagan who
worked at Frank's pencil factory, with the lynching of Frank being in response
to the commuting of his death sentence to life imprisonment after organized
Jewry had tried to cast doubt on Frank's conviction by shifting the blame to a
black man even though ritual
murder is a known
Jewish tradition, the ADL being used thereafter to denounce anti-criminals as "anti-Semites"
whenever
the criminals happened to be Jews.
It wasn't Muslims who took over the "investigation" of the World Trade Center
collapses when FEMA were
making a hash of the cover up,
mixed up Figures 11-51 and 11-52 in NCSTAR1-9Vol2 on their WTC7 report which
was published two days after the mysterious death of eyewitness
Barry
Jennings whose testimony of explosions
in WTC7 before either Tower had collapsed - note he specifically says
(4:43) "I
was trapped in there when both buildings came down" -
blew their politically motivated
assumptions and conclusions apart, failed to spot their mistake in their
accompanying description,
assumed unrealistically high gas temperatures in order to derive their
required unrealistically high steel temperatures, published a preposterous
hypothesis
of a "thermal-expansion"-based collapse with the logical conclusion that the
180
kip shear capacity of four bolts in a seated connection would be exceeded if the
steel heated up from
20 C to 32 C making the force to completely resist the
thermal expansion
191 kip,
irrespective of the fact that no steel-framed high-rises had ever collapsed due to
"fires" or "impacts" apart from the three that allegedly did so on 9/11, claimed inward bowing of the WTC1 perimeter columns
between floors 94 to 100
peaking at 55 inches at column 316 on the 96th floor
which could not be reconciled with the fact that
the columns' moment of inertia
or second moment of area was
at least 342 ins^4 along
the minor axis and a
maximum deflection of 55 inches given fixed - fixed boundary conditions and a
distributed load would have required the failure within 102 minutes of
at least
ten consecutive floors, many of which did not have any fireproofing 'dislodged'
by a plane and did not even experience substantial fires; it was NIST, whose top
scientists and engineers have
extensive knowledge of nano-thermites, but said
they had found "no evidence" of explosives at the WTC and later
admitted that
they had not bothered to look for any. The 9/11 perpetrators had to ensure
those in charge of the "investigation" were aware of that which they must not
find.
It wasn't a Muslim who announced on Sunday September 16, 2001 that a
"hijacker's passport" (allegedly that of Satam al Suqami) had been found
"several
blocks from the ruins of the World Trade Center", with other reports asserting that the passport was
found "in the vicinity of Vesey Street"; it was former Police Commissioner
Bernard Kerik who was indicted November 2007 on multiple counts including lying,
fraud and conspiracy, which is consistent with the fact that the laws of
aerodynamics dictate that
the passport should have been found in the vicinity of
Liberty Street, the scriptwriter forgot that Suqami was supposed to be on
Flight AA11
approaching from the north, and, of several attempts made by the authorities to
guess where the passport should have been found, not one of them was correct!
It wasn't Muslims who had JFK killed;
it was
Jews.
It wasn't Muslims who stole elections by exploiting electronic voting
machines that biased the results such that the odds for several swing states to
swing as much as they did from the exit polls was
250 million to one against; it was George W. Bush.
