Sunday, August 26, 2012

Media stuck on fake 2011 Bin Laden killing

[Originally posted at]

 August 24, 2012 |  By: Jeffrey Phelps

Side by side images show the media's alleged dead Bin Laden photo used to fool the American public that Seal Team Six killed Bin Laden in 2011 was a total photoshoped fake.
Thursday's report detailing the AP revealing the identity of a Navy Seal who's writing a tell-all book about the alleged Bin Laden raid and killing in 2011 proves the establishment media is not yet willing to admit the raid was simply the umpteenth continuation of the fable that Bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

Literally minutes after 747s hit World Trade Center buildings one and two, on the morning of 9/11/01, the universal talking point emerged that former CIA asset Osama Bin Laden was likely responsible, despite their having been no evidence to back those claims. The entire media somehow began to magically parrot the same exact script as if it were written before hand and faxed to the news departments of each major news agency at the exact same time. Days later, Bin Laden himself denied any responsibility. Extremely unlikely for an alleged radical Muslim extremist, should they have actually been involved in or the mastermind behind a politically motivated attack.

Soon thereafter it was discovered that the so-called 9/11 “mastermind” was suffering from kidney, lung and other problems and died of natural causes, reported two weeks after his death and public funeral in Afghanistan, on the day after Christmas. It had even been revealed he was under the close watch of the US the day before the 9/11 attacks, guarded by US forces while undergoing one of those dialysis treatments in a Pakistani hospital. CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta was quoted in early 2002, after reviewing pre and post 9/11 photos of Bin Laden, noting his features as being that of someone suffering the final stages of kidney failure.

The FBI themselves eventually admitted there was just not enough evidence to indict Bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks and never officially added him as a suspect for the crime. Although the FBI was closely monitoring Bin Laden and the alleged al-Qaeda network, the individual who was leading the FBI's al-Qaeda/Bin Laden task force and may have been able to answer many of these unanswered questions, John O'Neill, the man who supposedly knew more about Bin Laden than any one else in America, was driven out of the FBI just prior to 9/11. He was then given the job of replacing President George W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, as head of security for the World Trade Center, days before 9/11 and was killed in the attack that fateful morning. 9/11 was, ironically, Mr. O'Neill's first day on the job.

Then we have the long-standing, thoroughly documented business partnership between the Bush, Cheney and Bin Laden families. Most notably the Halliburton corporation and the Bin Laden construction company's gigantic no-bid contracts acquired for the purposes of rebuilding Iraq after its destruction at the hands of the founders of PNAC.

As tough as that may be to stomach, equally as tough is evidence that clearly demonstrates the many different attempts by the controlled US media to submit dozens of fabricated videos and images throughout the years that were used to sell the public that Bin Laden was still alive and still a terrorist threat. This allowed the Western establishment and its media to continue pushing the false boogeyman paradigm, in part so the people of the US could be stripped of their rights via “Patriot” Act style legislation. A bill, ironically enough, that had been written long before the Bush Jr. administration, mostly during the Clinton administration and rolled out after the 9/11 attacks.

Finally, but apparently and unfortunately not the last that we'll see of false Western war propaganda, right down to the totally staged Bin Laden raid and killing in 2011, not even local residents in Abbottabad, Pakistan that lived in the same neighborhood as the alleged Bin Laden compound believe was either Bin Laden's, or that he was even there at the time. Many local residents claim the man the US killed there was someone totally different.